Truly, the four-barrel is up on the little six mostly for WOW value. For me, the whole purpose of doing this project was to have something totally unique, and possibly even outrageous to show at car shows. A souped-up six is certainly unique. I see these occasionally at shows (like Roger’s wagon!) and I am impressed! Seeing a four-barrel on a CI aluminum head would be OUTRAGEOUS! So, of course, THAT’S what I wanted!
As for being over-carbureted, it is a model 8007, which is rated at 390 cfm. I did some Desktop Dyno studies, and according to that, my setup should be good for 265 hp @ 6250 rpm. Whether or not this is reasonable, it indicates I should size the carb to about 360 cfm. Hence, the selection of the 390 cfm carb.
In retrospect, I sincerely wish I had chosen to do something more conservative. My Desktop Dyno study also revealed that a milder cam (264 degree vs. my 274) would have provided much better torque and power under normal street operation, but I was seduced by big numbers, and impressed with a similar setup used by someone on the FordSix forum who’s six cylinder Mustang was running low 14’s in the quarter. There are vague plans in the back of my mind to someday perhaps “de-tune” to a milder setup.
In the meantime, I really need to get the old gal running decently so I can start to enjoy her again. I do believe, finally, that I am close. She does run pretty well except for her reluctance to “go” when I push the “go” pedal. I am encouraged, but it still needs to be better before I’ll “enjoy”.
I appreciate everyone’s input. Taking it all into consideration, I believe I will stand by the four-barrel, at least for now. With your encouragement, I’ve successfully taken the thing apart and found a couple of issues. This weekend I’ll put it back together and try setting it up again, from scratch. If I still can’t get it running acceptably, I’ll make an appointment with Dr. Brown.
Gary MacDonald
ROGER's...
EX... '63 Hardtop
Had...
Scarebird front discs
200 w/ CI alum head
C4
Bookmarks