-
October 7th, 2012, 11:27 AM
#1
mathmatical headache
This is all on main bearings in a 200. clearance specs are between .0008-.0015. I checked with plastiguage and got .002..seems to be just outside the max.. I didn't want to spend the money on turning the crank on this one, so i'm thinking a set of .001 undersize should close the gap enough..from what i understand the standard bearings are no longer made and the most common are the .010 undersize, which would mean having the thing turned. anyone else try this budget fix? or am I stuck with the extra step?
-
October 8th, 2012, 08:09 AM
#2
Which bearings are you using to get the .002 reading? Standard? .001 undersize would close your gap even more.
You should check the clearance with a set of micrometers if you can barrow or rent them.
Patrick Brown
331 Stroker / T5 / 8" / Wilwood Disks / RRS R&P Steering / Megasquirt EFI
![](image.php?s=b81e388c5ab38ea60c50596907fd0c79&u=2&type=sigpic&dateline=1158692700)
-
October 8th, 2012, 10:58 PM
#3
I just bought a set of std bearings last fall. I think most of the gap is in the bearing and you may be way tight if you assume its the crank journal. I'd run it as-is and use a good oil. New pump too.
Roger Moore
63 "Flarechero"
powered by: 347ci stroker | Tremec T5 | 8" 3:45 TracLoc rear
![](image.php?s=b81e388c5ab38ea60c50596907fd0c79&u=5&type=sigpic&dateline=1609285289)
-
October 9th, 2012, 09:13 PM
#4
I think I'm going to leave it as is. it is so close to specs that it can wait a bit longer. and I would hate to spin one out if i get too small of a gap. I did replace the pump just because it is to much of a pain to get to. thanks again for the replies.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks